[ad_1]
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. — If the PGA Tour and Saudi Arabia’s Public Funding Fund find yourself going into enterprise collectively, what is going to that imply for LIV defectors being admitted again to the Tour?
That is still to be decided, and whereas there have been many opinions on whether or not they need to be punished or allowed again as a result of they “strengthen the product,” few have steered what would make for a good punishment.
The most typical participant response has been to say some type of it being above their pay grade. However not Golf Channel’s Brandel Chamblee. He has been one among if not probably the most constant and sharpest critics of LIV, and he responded to a query on social media on what he thought truthful punishment for leaping to LIV may be. “They need to have to take a seat out for a time period, pay fines, and after they come again, assist/play in solely non-signature occasions for as lengthy they performed for LIV,” Chamblee wrote on X.
Final week, Rory McIlroy stated he didn’t assume LIV defectors must be punished. Rickie Fowler was first to publicly say he disagreed with McIlroy. He has had extra firm sharing his opinion this week, particularly two-time main winner Justin Thomas and world No. 1 Scottie Scheffler.
“I might say that there’s a handful of gamers on LIV that may make the tour a greater place, however I’m undoubtedly not within the settlement that they need to simply be capable of come again that simply,” Thomas stated Tuesday, two days earlier than the WM Phoenix Open will get underway at TPC Scottsdale. “I believe there’s quite a lot of us that made sacrifices … I might have a tough time with it (welcoming again LIV gamers with out penalty).”
On Wednesday, Golfweek’s Eamon Lynch requested world No. 1 Scottie Scheffler how he feels concerning the topic throughout “Golf As we speak” on Golf Channel.
They need to have to take a seat out for a time period, pay fines and after they come again, assist/play in solely non signature occasions for so long as they performed for LIV. https://t.co/GLf9WNrJwn
— Brandel Chamblee (@chambleebrandel) February 8, 2024
“That’s undoubtedly a sophisticated subject that I’m not sitting too far on one aspect of the fence with that,” Scheffler stated. “I believe there’s a distinct degree of participant that left – you had some guys that left our Tour after which sued our Tour, that wasn’t actually in nice style; and then you definately had another guys that simply left they usually wished to do one thing totally different, and everyone made their determination, and I’ve no unhealthy blood towards the fellows that left. However a path towards coming again, it wouldn’t be a extremely popular determination, I believe, if they simply got here again like nothing ever occurred. They did type of depart and – they left our Tour, that’s simply a part of it. There must be a pathway again for them, however they undoubtedly shouldn’t be capable of come again with none type of contribution to the Tour.”
When pressed as to what that pathway and punishment ought to appear to be, Scheffler supplied little of substance.
“I’m not likely positive what that’s, however there must be one thing,” Scheffler added. “I believe that’s going to be the opinion of a lot of the gamers that stayed. You already know, we remained loyal to a tour, a tour that was loyal to us. I constructed my total profession right here on the PGA Tour, and I wasn’t keen to depart it. I dreamt of enjoying on this tour. A number of the guys that left, perhaps that wasn’t for them, however I believe if they need a pathway again, there must be one, nevertheless it undoubtedly shouldn’t simply be coming again in first week they wish to come again and play. There must be some type of caveat to them getting again on our tour.”
To this point, solely Chamblee has publicly supplied what a model of punishment may appear to be.
[ad_2]
Source link
